🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.